RESUMEN
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are increasingly initiated as treatment for type 2 diabetes due to favourable cardiorenal characteristics. However, studies have identified an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). We carried out a retrospective, case-based study at East and North Herts NHS Trust between February 2018 and December 2020. Fifteen cases of SGLT2i associated DKA were identified in people with presumed type 2 diabetes;33.3% were classed as euglycaemic DKA with a blood glucose of <11mmol/L. All cases were associated with a significant precipitating factor including diarrhoea, vomiting, reduced oral intake and sepsis. One case was related to COVID-19. Two people were subsequently found to have raised islet autoantibodies suggesting type 1 diabetes or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. It is important that awareness of SGLT2i associated DKA is raised among users and health care practitioners, including the recognition of euglycaemic DKA. Sick day rules should be emphasised and reiterated at clinical encounters. Non-specialists in primary care, oncology and in perioperative settings should be empowered to advocate for temporary withdrawal and there should be readier access to blood ketone monitoring when required. When SGLT2i associated DKA occurs, due consideration should be given to evaluate the diabetes classification and investigate the circumstances of the event. Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons.Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
RESUMEN
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its associated morbidities are a great global concern. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and high mortality in patients with COVID-19. Objective(s): This study examined the frequency of BM, newly diagnosed hyperglycemia, and their impacts on hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Method(s): This retrospective study examined 810 medical records of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to Razi Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran. The clinical presentations, severity, and impacts of COVID-19 were compared between patients with and without DM. Disease severity was determined based on the NEWS2 scoring system. Result(s): This study included 810 medical records of COVID-19 patients, of whom 326 had pre-existing DM, and 484 were non-DM. The rates of diabetes and newly diagnosed hyperglycemia were 40.2% and 11.2%, respectively. The most common underlying diseases were hypertension (35.3%), ischemic heart disease (17.9%), and chronic kidney disease (11.9%), which were higher in people with diabetes than non-diabetics. The rate of acute kidney injury was higher in patients with diabetes than in non-diabetics (30.7% vs. 19.2%;P < 0.001) and in patients with severe COVID-19 than in those whose disease was not severe (27.8% vs. 21.5%;P = 0.04). The rates of severe COVID-19 (46.3% vs. 34.7%;P = 0.093), ICU admission (40.7% vs. 27.4%;P = 0.012), and mortality (18.5% vs. 10.5%;P = 0.079) were higher in patients with newly diagnosed hyperglycemia than in euglycemic patients. Conclusion(s): This study showed that COVID-19 infection is linked with newly diagnosed hyperglycemia and pre-existing DM, both associated with severe COVID-19, more need for ICU admission, and mortality.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).
RESUMEN
We conducted a review and evaluated the already documents reports for the relationship among diabetes and COVID-19. The review outcome shows that the COVID-19 severity seems to be greater among patients with diabetes as comorbidity. So, strict glycemic control is imperative in patients infected with COVID-19. Thus, world-wide diabetes burden and COVID-19 pandemic must be deliberated as diabetes increases the COVID-19 severity. Established on this, it is precise significant to follow specific treatment protocols and clinical management in COVID-19 patients affected with diabetes to prevent morbidity and mortality.Copyright © 2023 The Authors.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmacist-managed protocol for transitioning critically ill patients from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous insulin compared with a provider-managed process. Method(s): This single-center, retrospective, observational study included patients admitted to the medical or surgical/trauma intensive care unit who received a continuous infusion of iv insulin from January 2019 to April 2021. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age, pregnant, incarcerated, or received iv insulin for the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state, calcium channel blocker or beta blocker overdose, or hypertriglyceridemia. The primary outcome was the percentage of blood glucose (BG) concentrations within the target range of 70-150 mg/dL from 0 to 48 h following transition to subcutaneous insulin. Secondary outcomes included percentage of BG concentrations within goal range following transition at 0-12 h and 12-24 h, incidence of hypo- and hyperglycemia, and percentage of patients requiring dose adjustments after initial transition. Result(s): A total of 110 unique patients were included with 70 patients in the provider-managed group and 40 patients in the pharmacist-managed group. On average, pharmacists transitioned patients to 63% basal insulin based on their 24-h total day dose of insulin. The pharmacist-managed group achieved glycemic control in 53% of transitions at 12 h, 40% at 24 h, and 47% from 0 to 48 h, while the provider group achieved glycemic control in 25% of transitions at 12 h, 12% at 24 h, and 18% from 0 to 48 h (p < 0.001 for all time points). As for safety end points, the pharmacist-managed group demonstrated lower rates of hypoglycemia (p = 0.001), severe hypoglycemia (p = 0.332), hyperglycemia (p < 0.001), and severe hyperglycemia (p < 0.001) compared with the provider-managed group. Conclusion(s): Pharmacists can effectively and safely transition critically ill patients from iv to subcutaneous insulin utilizing a standardized protocol.Copyright © 2023 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
RESUMEN
Comprehensive medication management (CMM) is increasingly provided by health care teams through telehealth or hybrid modalities. The purpose of this scoping literature review was to assess the published literature and examine the economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes of CMM services provided by pharmacists via telehealth or hybrid modalities. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included if they: reported on economic, clinical, or humanistic outcomes;were conducted via telehealth or hybrid modalities;included a pharmacist on their interprofessional team;and evaluated CMM services. The search was conducted between January 1, 2000, and September 28, 2021. The search strategy was adapted for use in Medline (PubMed);Embase;Cochrane;Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature;PsychINFO;International Pharmaceutical s;Scopus;and grey literature. Four reviewers extracted data using a screening tool developed for this study and reviewed for risk of bias. Authors screened 3500 articles, from which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 observational studies, 2 RCTs). In seven studies, clinical outcomes improved with telehealth CMM interventions compared to either usual care, face-to-face CMM, or educational controls, as shown by the statistically significant changes in chronic disease clinical outcomes. Two studies evaluated and found increased patient and provider satisfaction. One study described a source of revenue for a telehealth CMM service. Overall, study results indicate that telehealth CMM services, in select cases, may be associated with improved clinical outcomes, but the methods of the included studies were not homogenous enough to conclude that telehealth or hybrid modalities were superior to in-person CMM. To understand the full impact on the Quadruple Aim, additional research is needed to investigate the financial outcomes of CMM conducted using telehealth or hybrid technologies.Copyright © 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
RESUMEN
Background and aims: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being is a matter of significant concern. Besides the depression associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) diagnosis and management, the COVID-19 pandemic has also imposed significant distress among people with DM. Method(s): This is a narrative review of the interplay between DM management and depression amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic databases, namely;PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched for literature. Search terms were "diabetes", "depression", and ''corona virus", "COVID-19","diabetes self-care","diabetes self-care in low income countries and diabetes management in Zimbabwe". Result(s): This paper discusses the interaction between DM and depression, amid the COVID-19 pandemic. We further explain the implications on DM management, screening and elaborate on possible solutions to effective prevention and management of depression. Conclusion(s): We have made recommendations for prevention and management of depression such as collaborative practice, early and routine screening, meticulous self-care and use of non-pharmacological strategies.Copyright © 2020 FSG Communications Ltd. All rights reserved.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of different amputation levels in diabetic foot patients and the incidence of repetitive foot surgeries and evaluate the factors causing a delay in hospital stay and amputation of patients. METHODOLOGY: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau, Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan. The study selected 375 participants from the clinic's daily patient inflow from October 2021 to March 2022 using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Those who had a delay in hospital stay and amputation were further followed up from May-October 2022. The chi-square test and Kruskal Wallis test (p-value <0.05) were used to correlate the effect of the level of lower limb amputation and the cause of delay in amputation using SPSS version 24.0. RESULT(S): Total 246(65.60%) were males and 129(34.40%) were females. Toe amputation was the most commonly seen amputation in 173(46.1%) participants. About 168(44.8%) patients had some in-hospital delay stay during their treatment. Preoperative hurdles (Uncontrolled RBS, Osteomyelitis, etc.) were the most common factor causing an in-hospital delay in 92(24.5%) patients. The level of amputation performed was found to be statistically significant with factors causing a delay in hospital stay through chi-square (p=0.003*) and Kruskal Wallis test H (2) statistic= 13.3, df = 3, H (2), P=0.004*). CONCLUSION(S): Diabetic foot is a frequent cause of amputation globally, majorly in developing countries like Pakistan. On-time provision of treatment to these patients can decline the global amputation rate due to diabetic foot ulcers.Copyright © 2023 Syeda Anjala Tahir.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease and often found as a comorbid in COVID-19. Poor glycemic control might play a role in worsening of clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients who lead to increase morbidity and mortality. AIM: We conducted a study to evaluate relationship between T2DM with or without macrovascular and microvascular complications and cigarette smoking habit with COVID-19 outcomes. METHOD(S): A cross-sectional study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients was conducted in Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar from May 2020 to August 2020. COVID-19 status was obtained using real-time polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2, T2DM status was obtained using blood glucose or HbA1c, and other characteristic data were obtained. Mortality was the clinical outcome in our study. RESULT(S): One hundred and six subjects data were enrolled. Most subjects were male (n = 55;51.9%), and 55-65 year-old (n = 40;37.7%). Eighty subjects were survived (75.5%) and 26 subjects did not survive (24.5%). Onset of T2DM >= 5 years had a higher mortality rate compared to onset < 5 years (34.9% vs. 17.5%;p = 0.041). Other factors such as gender, age, nutritional status, hypertension, heart disease, smoking habit, and HbA1c did not show significant difference in terms of mortality. CONCLUSION(S): COVID-19 patients with onset of T2DM for more than 5 years had a worse outcome compared to the onset of T2DM <5 years.Copyright © 2023 Malik Chandra, Andi Makbul Aman, Himawan Sanusi, Husaini Umar.
RESUMEN
The 2022 Mary MacKinnon lecture reminds us of some of the history of the development of out of hospital specialist diabetes services in the United Kingdom. There have been multiple clarion calls across the years to collaborate, share information and values and break down traditional boundaries in the pursuit of improved patient care and outcomes. Along with this, we note the roles of clinical and managerial leadership, followership and partnership in working together with people living with diabetes to co-produce a model of diabetes care and then to ensure through good stewardship of shared resources that the expectations of that change are delivered for our population. We go on to discuss how the Diabetes Care for You team has continued to innovate and provide care during the pandemic and conclude with a vision of the future and a challenge for decision makers to put the needs of the population at the forefront of future planning. Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons.Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
RESUMEN
Background: There has been lot of speculation around the possible side effects associated with COVID vaccination and incidence of facial palsy is one of them. Bilateral facial palsy is less likely to be idiopathic as compared to unilateral facial nerve palsy and warrants further investigations to find any secondary cause. COVID 19 infection and the vaccinations for the same are also included in the unique list of differentials. Case report: We report an interesting case of bilateral rapidly sequential facial nerve palsy following the administration of COVID vaccination that showed subsequent improvement. We provide literature review to report the current incidence of same, secondary to the vaccination as well the infection itself Case presentation: Following the introduction of COVID 19 vaccine, there have been reports of various cranial nerve involvement including lower motor neuron type facial paresis. Bilateral facial palsy is less likely to be idiopathic as compared to unilateral palsy(23% vs 70%) and requires further work up to determine the etiology before determining to be idiopathic. Unilateral facial palsy(FP) has been reported in the Phase I and II trials for Pfizer and Moderna vaccine, with a total of 7 cases reported in these initial trials. To date, there is no direct evidence that these vaccines have increased the incidence of facial palsy as compared to adverse events reported with other vaccines or compared to COVID 19 infection itself. We report a unique case of bilateral lower motor neuron type facial palsy noted in a young male within hours of receiving the vaccine that later improved with treatment. Reports of simultaneous bilateral facial palsy after vaccine are rare with only few cases reported to date in literature. Conclusion(s): In conclusion from current available literature, we would like to postulate that though there is a risk of facial nerve palsy following the vaccination, it is comparable to the risks associated with any other vaccinations and not been higher than the non-vaccinated population. The overall risk is higher with the actual COVID 19 infection itself as compared to the vaccine.Copyright © 2022
RESUMEN
Aim: This study aimed at investigating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on metabolic profile in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia patients at the time of COVID-19. Material(s) and Method(s): This study was completed with 190 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia (116) and bipolar disorder (74). Waist circumference and blood pressure measurements were taken on the same date as triglyceride, glucose and HDL data in the electronic recording system of the participants. Initial assessment data are measurements within 3 months prior to the publication of the first case in Turkey. The second evaluation data, on the other hand, is the data obtained within 3 months after the date of removal or relaxation of the restrictions, which is defined as the normalization period. Result(s): A significant increase was observed in the incidence of metabolic syndrome in the participants after the COVID-19 lockdown. In addition, a significant increase in glucose, triglyceride and diastolic blood pressure values, and a significant decrease in HDL values were detected. There was no significant change in systolic blood pressure and waist circumference values. Discussion(s): It has been shown that the COVID-19 lockdown increases the incidence of metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and causes irregularities in metabolic syndrome parameters.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a predisposing factor for the development of many infectious complications. Numerous studies have demonstrated the association of hyperglycemia in patients having DM with a high risk of a more unfavorable course of COVID-19. However, hyperglycemia is often detected in patients with a COVID-19 not having anamnesis of DM. The following remains unclear: the etiological factors causing such disorders of carbohydrate metabolism, the persistence of these disorders and the characteristics of the course, as well as their comparative effect on the outcomes of COVID-19 and the further prognosis of patients. AIM: To study the prevalence and nature of carbohydrate metabolism disorders in patients with moderate to severe course of COVID-19, as well as 6 months after it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 of moderate and severe course of the disease were examined. There were no medical interventions outside recommendations of patient management. The observation was carried out during two time periods: inpatient treatment of a COVID-19 and 6 months after discharge. The following were evaluated: anamnesis data, the level of fasting plasma glucose;HbA1c, the results of computed tomography of the lungs, the drug therapy taken in all patients. Descriptive statistics methods were used to evaluate the parameters. RESULT(S): The study included 280 patients with a median age of 61.5+/-14,2 years. During the disease, a violation of carbohydrate metabolism was detected in 188 people (67%), the remaining patients (33%) made up the normoglycemia group. Patients with hyperglycemia were stratified in a following way: a group with an established diagnosis of DM before COVID -19 included - 56 people (20%), a group with steroid-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) - 95 people (34%), a group of stress- induced hyperglycaemia - 20 people (7%), with undiagnosed diabetes - 17 people (6%). In the postcovid period (after 6 months), the normal level of glycemia in the same sample group was observed in 199 people (71.4%);8 people (3%) were diagnosed with new cases of DM. The mortality rate was 10 people (3.6%) in the group of SIH (8 people) and undiagnosed DM (2 people). CONCLUSION(S): The use of glucocorticoids in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 leads to high incidence of SIH, which has reversible character. About 6% among hospitalized patients with a COVID-19 had undiagnosed DM and were not receiving antihyperglycemic therapy. The highest mortality was noted in the group of SIH, which allows us to conclude that SIH worsens the prognosis of patients to the greatest extent. Patients with newly diagnosed hyperglycemia, regardless of the level of hyperglycemia, are characterized by a more unfavorable course.Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic determined a profound impact on the routine follow-up of type 1 diabetes (T1D) children. Telemedicine represents a critical tool to guarantee regular care for these patients in this form. AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of telemedicine programs during the COVID-19 pandemic era on T1D children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Studies from PubMed, Cochrane, and Directory of Open Access Journals from December 2021, to February 18, 2022, were conducted to calculate the pooled mean difference using either a random or fixed-effect model in Review Manager version 5.3. Our study has applied to ensure that our procedures, including record collection, extraction of data, quality evaluation, and statistical analysis, adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Examination and Meta-Analysis guidelines. RESULT(S): Three articles relevant to the current study (436 children). Our pooled analysis found that there was an impact of telemedicine in reducing the HbA1c (mean diff: 5.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.71-7.57], p < 0.00001). However, the physical activity was not affected by the telemedicine program (mean diff: -37.25 [95% CI -317.53- 243.02], p = 0.79). CONCLUSION(S): Our findings suggest that telemedicine has a role in T1D children controlling HbA1c during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, telehealth has emerged as a promising alternate mode of health-care delivery. Its utility during the pandemic warrants further investigation.Copyright © 2023 Nur Rochmah, Farahdina Farahdina, Wika Yuli Deakandi, Qurrota Ayuni Novia Putri, Tyas Maslakhatien Nuzula, Katherine Fedora, Qorri 'Aina, Muhammad Faizi.
RESUMEN
The COVID-19 Pneumonia with diabetic ketoacidosis is a dreadful health condition. Diabetic ketoacidosis is one of the severe metabolic complications and it can be precipitated by infection. We presented a case of 48 years female with no known comorbidities who presented with COVID-19 symptoms and with Diabetic Ketoacidosis. The case presented with elevated inflammatory markers, high anion gap metabolic acidosis with type I respiratory failure. During admission, the oxygen saturation had marked drop, later her improvement was steady followed by gradual tapering of the oxygenation. Marked improvement was noticed in the subsequent follow-up. COVID-19 infection can be precipitated by preexisting diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes and the severity of COVID-19 infection is more pronounced in patients with diabetes mellitus, thus should be managed timely and accordingly. The scarce studies among the COVID-19 cases with diabetic ketoacidosis reflect the need for further studies for the availability of a wider range of information. Copyright © 2021, Kathmandu University. All rights reserved.